Monica Allen Tuesday, November 24, 2020 / Categories: Research Headlines, Air Quality US methane “hotspot” is snapshot of local pollution The giant methane cloud spotted by satellite over the U.S. Southwest that made national headlines in 2014 wasn’t a persistent, undiscovered “hotspot” as first thought, but the result of a nightly atmospheric condition and topography that trapped industrial and natural emissions of the potent greenhouse gas near the ground in the basin overnight, according to new research published in the journal Elementa by CIRES and NOAA. The news that a European Space Agency satellite had observed the unexpectedly large methane cloud in the Four Corners region of Arizona, Colorado, New Mexico and Utah from 2002 to 2012 rumbled through the scientific community because researchers calculated that the “hot spot” was generating 3.5 times more methane than estimated in a widely-used European Union greenhouse gas database. Methane is a potent greenhouse gas, about 28 times more powerful than carbon dioxide over 100 years. Mapping methane This map shows how methane levels differ from average background levels for 2003 to 2009, as derived from remote sensing data from the European Space Agency's SCIAMACHY instrument. Purple and dark blue areas are below average, pale blue and green are close to normal, and yellows and red indicate higher-than-normal anomalies. Note that the San Juan Basin near the Four Corners region is the only red spot on the map. Image: NASA/JPL-Caltech/University of Michigan But the daily satellite observations of the 2,500 square-mile San Juan Basin weren’t detailed enough to reveal the exact causes or sources of the methane. So in 2015, scientists from two University of Colorado institutes, CIRES and INSTAAR, and from NOAA participated in an intensive field campaign that used instrumented aircraft and vans to investigate those questions. Researchers criss-crossed the basin in instrumented aircraft to detect and map methane and ethane emission plumes. Scientists then pinpointed hundreds of emission sources identified from the air. They were able to zero in on emission plumes for a closer look at different sources with other instruments in specially equipped vans. This work was made possible thanks to a close collaboration with the U.S. Bureau of Land Management, state and local governments, and two Native American Tribes, which own much of the land and regulate oil and gas development in the region. The team found that 66 to 75 percent of the methane detected by their two aircraft came from natural gas and coal bed methane operations in the basin. Another 5 percent drifted in from oil development 75 miles to the south in New Mexico. Methane leaking naturally from an exposed outcrop of the Fruitland coal formation in La Plata County, Colorado, added no more than 8 percent. Gas venting from an underground coal mine near Farmington, New Mexico, contributed less than 2 percent. And what about the methane hotspot the satellite detected? Lead author Gabrielle Pétron, a CIRES researcher working at NOAA’s Global Monitoring Laboratory, said that the European satellite passed over the region in the morning, when methane was still trapped under the atmospheric inversions that concentrate pollution overnight near the surface in many western U.S. oil and gas basins. By mid-afternoon, westerly winds typically would disperse much of the stagnant, methane-rich air. Measuring methane Two vans, outfitted with sophisticated chemical detection instruments, sampled emission plumes near methane sources to take fine-scale chemical signature measurements. Credit: Gabrielle Pétron/CIRES While the “Four Corners hotspot” has now been shown to not be as severe as first thought, Petron said that their research provides some important lessons. First, sustained, coordinated measurements are important for identifying the sources and causes of apparent pollution spikes, she said. Snapshot observations by a satellite flying overhead once a day should be followed up by on-the ground investigations to understand their true nature. Second, the cooperation of landowners, regulators and operators is highly valuable for getting a close look at emission sources. Finally, real-time monitoring is a reliable way to quickly identify anomalously large pollution sources. When they found substantial leaks, the researchers told officials, who notified the operators. “Methane is a powerful greenhouse gas,” Pétron said. “Real time high-resolution methane detection from vehicles, drones, aircraft, and satellite are effective ways to help industry detect - and repair - leaks.” According to Pétron, their study shows how coordinated field measurements can provide a detailed picture of emissions sources and their impacts in a particular region. But she hopes that’s not the only takeaway. “It’s important that research focuses not only on quantifying emissions, but also informing actions and policies to reduce emissions significantly over the long term,” she said. For more information, please contact Theo Stein, NOAA Communications, at email@example.com Previous Article NOAA’s ocean exploration advisory board forges ahead with new members Next Article A warm pool in the Indo-Pacific Ocean has almost doubled in size, changing global rainfall patterns Print 819 Tags: air pollution air quality methane Global Monitoring Laboratory Related articles Lawns provide surprising contribution to L.A. Basin’s carbon emissions When smoke is in the air, all eyes turn to this NOAA weather model NOAA experimental model predicts smoke movement from California fire New NOAA research model improves dust, air quality forecasts The Saharan Air Layer: What is it? Why does NOAA track it?