This news release was provided by the NOAA Cooperative Institute for Research and Environmental Sciences at the University of Colorado Boulder. To view their release, click here. Contact: Katy Human, email@example.com, 303-735-0196.
Reducing the amount of desert dust swept onto snowy Rocky Mountain peaks could help Western water managers deal with the challenges of a warmer future, according to a new study led by researchers at NOAA’s Cooperative Institute for Research in Environmental Sciences (CIRES) at theUniversity of Colorado Boulder.
With support from the CIRES Western Water Assessment (WWA) and NASA’s Interdisciplinary Science program, CIRES’ Jeffrey Deems and his colleagues examined the combined effects of regional warming and dust on the Colorado River, which is fed primarily by snowmelt.
During recent years, desert dust has been settling thick and dark on the snowpack in the northern Rocky Mountain headwaters of the Colorado River, and snowpack is melting out as many as six weeks earlier than it did in the 1800s, according to the new assessment, published last week inHydrology and Earth System Sciences. Snow dusted with dark particles absorbs more of the Sun’s rays and melts faster than clean snow.
Add the regional warming expected in the future, and the situation seems likely to grow more dire for the 40 million people who depend on the Colorado River for water. The river’s flow falls by more than 20 percent by 2100 in some of the future climate scenarios Deems and his colleagues investigated. Moreover, warming could make dust problems worse, by increasing the risk of drought.
“But we may be able to do something about dust,” said Deems, who works with WWA and CIRES’National Snow and Ice Data Center. “If the future normal is this extreme dust scenario and we can push that scenario back to lower dust levels with land restoration or management, we could keep the snow in the mountains longer, and maybe even get some of that water back.”
Dust on snow
Snow dusted with dark particles absorbs more of the Sun’s rays and melts faster than clean snow. (Chris Landry, Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies)
Since the mid-1800s, human land use activities have disturbed Southwestern desert soils and broken up the soil crust that curbs wind erosion, leading to increased dust. In previous research, Deems and his colleagues showed that increasing dustiness leads to accelerated snowpack melt.
That earlier work was based on the moderately dusty years of 2005–2008, with about five times as much dust than in the 1800s. But during 2009, 2010 and 2013, unprecedented amounts of desert dust fell on Colorado snowpacks, about five times more than observed from 2005–2008. Moreover, other researchers have reported that climate change is likely to increase the frequency and intensity of drought in the Southwest, which could increase dust problems further by harming the grasses and shrubs that reduce surface wind speeds.
For the new work, the researchers used climate and hydrology models to investigate the effect of that “extreme dust” on the Colorado River’s flow now and in the future, as the Southwest continues to warm. Snowmelt in the extreme dust scenario shifted even earlier in the season, by another three weeks, pulling peak water levels in the Colorado River to earlier in the spring and leaving less water for later in the year.
“In the Upper Colorado River Basin, the snowpack is our most important reservoir,” said co-author Thomas Painter of NASA’s Jet Propulsion Laboratory. “With continued dusty years and greater warming, water managers will have to make their decisions very early in the season. No longer will they have the nice long snowmelt season, shortened as it already has been, to see how snowmelt runoff is going.”
Dust on snowpack
Dust on snowpack in the San Juan Mountains, Senator Beck Basin, Colorado, May 16, 2013. (Photo by Jeffrey Deems)
The research team also found a subtle shift on the total water loss in the Colorado River, from a loss of 5 percent estimated during the moderate dust years of 2005–2008, to a total loss of about 6 percent lost during extremely dusty years. This relatively small change is due primarily to the fact that as snowmelt creeps earlier and earlier in the year, the Sun’s angle in the sky is shallower and provides less energy for evaporation than it does later in the spring.
“Our results suggest that if we can adopt dust-reducing land management strategies and rehabilitate major dust sources, we can keep our snow on the mountains longer, and perhaps offset some of the emerging climate impacts,” said co-author Brad Udall, director of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy and the Environment at CU-Boulder. “Dust reduction could be a very powerful strategy to help us adapt to the growing impacts of climate change on our precious water supplies in the American Southwest.”
CIRES is a joint institute of NOAA and CU-Boulder.
High-resolution images available:
● Click for images: Chris Landry and Andrew Temple of the Center for Snow and Avalanche Studies in Silverton, Colo., measure dust loading at Swamp Angel Study Plot in the San Juan Mountains, Colo., May 17, 2010. Photo by Jeffrey Deems.
● Click for images: The Senator Beck field site amidst extremely dusty snow, San Juan Mountains, Colo., May 16, 2013. Photo by Jeffrey Deems.
● Click for images: Dust on snowpack in Senator Beck Basin, San Juan Mountains, Colo., May 16, 2013. Photo by Jeffrey Deems.
● Dr. Jeffrey Deems, lead author, CIRES Western Water Assessment and National Snow and Ice Data Center scientist, firstname.lastname@example.org, 303-492-4743.
● Brad Udall, director of the Getches-Wilkinson Center for Natural Resources, Energy and the Environment, Colorado Law, email@example.com, 720-984-2723.
● Alan Buis, NASA Communications, for co-author Dr. Thomas Painter, firstname.lastname@example.org, 818-354-0474.
● Katy Human, CIRES communications, email@example.com, 303-735-0196.
● Heidi Koontz, U.S. Geological Survey public affairs, for co-author Dr. Jayne Belnap, firstname.lastname@example.org, 303-202-4763.